 |
AMA Claiming rule
The AMA claiming rule was originally written for dirt track
racing to keep the equipment fair in a sport that was relatively
static as far as equipment was concerned at that time. It was
written long before motocross had arrived and long before the
Japanese factories were developing very expensive works bikes
for research and development that was supposed to filter down to
the companies production bikes. AMA Championships equaled
increased sales and while motocross in the US was relatively
young at this time, it was growing at an exponential rate.
During the seventies motocross was in a hyper-evolution phase
with engine, chassis and suspension design. The factories
were not only trying to win on Sunday and sell on Monday with
their factory teams, they were competing against each other to
build the best production bike to sell to the public. It
was not uncommon for a production bike to be outdated in six
months after it was released and at the works bike level this
could occur on a week by week basis. The price of some of
the Japanese works bikes in 1976 was approaching the price of
the National median home value of $44,000.00. The Type 2 Honda's
probably exceeded that while a production 125 sold for less than
$1000.00. While all this was going on the claiming rule in
the AMA rule book remained, in fact it was virtually forgotten
until May 23rd 1976.
The
rule stated that any rider in the race with another rider could
purchase the bike the other rider was riding for a sum. In 1976
the sum for a 125 was $2500.00. If rider A wanted to own rider
B's bike, both riders had to compete against each other in the
same race. Rider A had 30 minutes from the time the checkered
flag fell on the first place rider to notify the AMA referee of
the claim of rider B's bike. He then had to give the Ref the
required funds in the form of a Certified Check or Cash. If
rider B wanted to keep his bike he could also file a claim on
the bike, put up the cash and then there would be a lottery or
drawing to decide who would get the bike. In 1976 the
factories worked together to counter claim any bike that might
be claimed by having all of their riders that were in the same
race as the bike being claimed, file a claim on the bike.
The mistake both riders made in 1976 was filing too soon.
Had Boone waited till the last minute to file the claim on
Hannah's OW27, He would have owned it.
|
 |